Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > users [DISABLED] > Re: Subversion vs. StarTeam

subversion
Discussion topic

Back to topic list

Re: Subversion vs. StarTeam

Author levyam
Full name Andy Levy
Date 2009-05-15 13:42:19 PDT
Message On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 16:34, James Greene <jgreene at collab dot net> wrote:
> Are these your Borland Pain Points?  Did I miss any?
>
> Moving code from one release to the next
> Moving client specific one-offs from one release to the next
> Getting clean check outs
> Updating local working copies in a timely manner (performance)
> Performance, Performance, Performance
> IDE integration
> Licensing
> Reporting
> Security (allowing people to delete their own files)
> Stability
> Integration w/ other products
> Having an instable trunk
> Reverting changes hard
> Branching/merging hard
> No tooling choices
> Bugs
> Poorly designed GUI
> Lack of Support

So what isn't painful? :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: webpost at tigris dot org [mailto:webpost at tigris dot org]
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 12:52 PM
> To: users at subversion dot tigris dot org; Greg Thomas
> Subject: RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam
>
> I bet its not free.  Once you get hooked the price goes way up.  We
> started out much cheaper.  Borland desupports versions and jacks the
> support cost up according to how hooked they think you are.  Ours
> support increased by a factor of about 4 one year.
>
>> After much hang-wringing by the local PHBs at work, I finally
>> persuaded them to go for Subversion as a SCM solution.
>>
>> Then, someone did a deal with Borland that gave us access to StarTeam
>> for free.
>>
>> So, the question I'm now being asked is - why Subversion and not
>> StarTeam, given that their purchase cost (to us, at least) is the
>> same.
>>
>> Has anyone done a comparison of the two - does anyone have any
>> comments, good or bad, about StarTeam?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Greg
>> --
>> This post represents the views of the author and does not necessarily
>> accurately represent the views of BT.
>>
>> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@su​bversion.tigris.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversio​n.tigris.org
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------
> http://subversion.ti​gris.org/ds/viewMess​age.do?dsForumId=106​5&dsMessageI
> d=2274063
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
> [users-unsubscribe@s​ubversion.tigris.org​].
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------
> http://subversion.ti​gris.org/ds/viewMess​age.do?dsForumId=106​5&dsMessageId=22​74417
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe@s​ubversion.tigris.org​].
>

« Previous message in topic | 15 of 17 | Next message in topic »

Messages

Show all messages in topic

Subversion vs. StarTeam Greg Thomas <thomasgd at omc dot bt dot co dot uk> Greg Thomas <thomasgd at omc dot bt dot co dot uk> 2004-08-05 02:13:14 PDT
     RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam webpost at tigris dot org webpost at tigris dot org 2009-05-15 12:43:42 PDT
         RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam "Talkov Roger" <Roger dot Talkov at uc4 dot com> "Talkov Roger" <Roger dot Talkov at uc4 dot com> 2009-05-15 15:57:35 PDT
         Re: Subversion vs. StarTeam David Weintraub <qazwart at gmail dot com> David Weintraub <qazwart at gmail dot com> 2009-05-18 08:57:59 PDT
             Subversion misses (was RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam) "Bolstridge, Andrew" <andy dot bolstridge at intergraph dot com> "Bolstridge, Andrew" <andy dot bolstridge at intergraph dot com> 2009-05-19 00:40:30 PDT
                 Re: Subversion misses (was RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam) David Weintraub <qazwart at gmail dot com> David Weintraub <qazwart at gmail dot com> 2009-05-19 07:12:22 PDT
                     RE: Subversion misses (was RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam) "Bolstridge, Andrew" <andy dot bolstridge at intergraph dot com> "Bolstridge, Andrew" <andy dot bolstridge at intergraph dot com> 2009-05-19 08:27:32 PDT
                         Re: Subversion misses (was RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam) stsp Stefan Sperling 2009-05-20 02:54:02 PDT
                             Re: Subversion misses (was RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam) stsp Stefan Sperling 2009-05-20 03:10:55 PDT
                             RE: Subversion misses (was RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam) "Reedick, Andrew" <jr9445 at ATT dot COM> "Reedick, Andrew" <jr9445 at ATT dot COM> 2009-05-21 09:36:18 PDT
                     RE: Subversion misses (was RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam) "Bolstridge, Andrew" <andy dot bolstridge at intergraph dot com> "Bolstridge, Andrew" <andy dot bolstridge at intergraph dot com> 2009-05-20 00:20:48 PDT
             RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam "Bolstridge, Andrew" <andy dot bolstridge at intergraph dot com> "Bolstridge, Andrew" <andy dot bolstridge at intergraph dot com> 2009-10-22 02:06:14 PDT
     RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam webpost at tigris dot org webpost at tigris dot org 2009-05-15 12:52:10 PDT
         RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam "James Greene" <jgreene at collab dot net> "James Greene" <jgreene at collab dot net> 2009-05-15 13:34:17 PDT
             Re: Subversion vs. StarTeam levyam Andy Levy 2009-05-15 13:42:19 PDT
     RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam webpost at tigris dot org webpost at tigris dot org 2009-05-18 05:05:36 PDT
         RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam webpost at tigris dot org webpost at tigris dot org 2009-05-18 10:09:19 PDT
Messages per page: