Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > dev [DISABLED] > Re: STATUS of 1.6

subversion
Discussion topic

Back to topic list

Re: STATUS of 1.6

Author markphip
Full name Mark Phippard
Date 2009-01-20 08:31:39 PST
Message On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Julian Foad
<julianfoad@btope​nworld.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 08:57 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Hi all, just another mail to check up on the status of the 1.6.x blocking
>> issues. TODO-1.6 hasn't changed that much over the last couple of weeks, but I
>> think we've made some progress toward the issues presented. They are:
>>
>> * #3334: Tree conflicts "merry-go-round" about update updating the base.
>> Julian Foad is working on this. Done for when victim is a file, still
>> doing for when victim is a directory. [julianfoad]
>> See:
>> <http://subversion.ti​gris.org/ds/viewMess​age.do?dsForumId=462​&dsMessageId=101​9712>.
>>
>> * #3354: update fails when file with local mods is moved and modified.
>> The bug has been fixed, but the regression test for the issue seems
>> to have problems.
>>
>> * Review the new "svn_dirent/svn_uri" API and ensure we aren't putting
>> functions into the public name space that we won't want to support.
>> See
>> <http://subversion.ti​gris.org/ds/viewMess​age.do?dsForumId=462​&dsMessageId=101​0183>.
>>
>> I know that Julian continues to work on issue #3334, do we know what work is left?
>
> I believe I've got it doing basically the right thing on the
> issue-3334-dirs branch. I have some test failures that I'm working
> through; some may be changed expectations and others may be bugs:
>
> FAIL: update_tests.py 7: update that deletes modified files
> FAIL: update_tests.py 47: tree conflicts on update 1.2
> FAIL: update_tests.py 48: tree conflicts on update 2.1
> FAIL: update_tests.py 49: tree conflicts on update 2.2
> FAIL: update_tests.py 51: tree conflicts on update 3
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 32: tree conflicts on switch 1.2
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 33: tree conflicts on switch 2.1
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 34: tree conflicts on switch 2.2
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 35: tree conflicts on switch 3
> FAIL: revert_tests.py 19: revert tree conflicts in updated files
> FAIL: stat_tests.py 31: status with tree conflicts

What do we see as the general release plan? I am assuming that once
these issues are wrapped up, buildbot is all green etc., that we will
make the branch and move directly to RC1?

If these issues are wrapped up this week do we plan to do this next week?

I just want to be able to prepare resources on my end. We (CollabNet)
plan to make binaries available as we did for 1.5 to help get as many
testers as possible.

--
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

« Previous message in topic | 3 of 12 | Next message in topic »

Messages

Show all messages in topic

STATUS of 1.6 "Hyrum K dot Wright" <hyrum_wright at mail dot utexas dot edu> "Hyrum K dot Wright" <hyrum_wright at mail dot utexas dot edu> 2009-01-19 06:57:50 PST
     Re: STATUS of 1.6 julianfoad Julian Foad 2009-01-19 08:53:53 PST
         Re: STATUS of 1.6 markphip Mark Phippard 2009-01-20 08:31:39 PST
             Re: STATUS of 1.6 "Hyrum K dot Wright" <hyrum_wright at mail dot utexas dot edu> "Hyrum K dot Wright" <hyrum_wright at mail dot utexas dot edu> 2009-01-20 08:55:20 PST
                 Re: STATUS of 1.6 markphip Mark Phippard 2009-01-20 08:56:42 PST
                     Re: STATUS of 1.6 "Hyrum K dot Wright" <hyrum_wright at mail dot utexas dot edu> "Hyrum K dot Wright" <hyrum_wright at mail dot utexas dot edu> 2009-01-20 09:19:46 PST
                         Re: STATUS of 1.6 markphip Mark Phippard 2009-01-27 07:39:09 PST
                             Re: STATUS of 1.6 sbutler Stephen Butler 2009-01-28 11:45:30 PST
                             Re: STATUS of 1.6 julianfoad Julian Foad 2009-01-28 12:55:43 PST
         Re: STATUS of 1.6 "Paul Burba" <ptburba at gmail dot com> "Paul Burba" <ptburba at gmail dot com> 2009-01-20 08:53:27 PST
     Re: Status of 1.6 Steinar Bang <sb at dod dot no> Steinar Bang <sb at dod dot no> 2009-01-24 10:59:17 PST
         Re: Status of 1.6 arfrever Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2009-01-24 11:30:42 PST
Messages per page: