Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > dev [DISABLED] > RE: [RFC] which bug tracker to use?

subversion
Discussion topic

Back to topic list

RE: [RFC] which bug tracker to use?

Author rhuijben
Full name Bert Huijben
Date 2009-11-10 06:35:46 PST
Message > -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein at gmail dot com]
> Sent: maandag 9 november 2009 16:10
> To: dev at subversion dot tigris dot org
> Subject: [RFC] which bug tracker to use?
>
> Hi all,
>
> Now that we're in the Incubator and on our way to becoming an Apache
> project, one of the items that we need to select is which bug tracker
> to use.
>
> I'll preface this with: the ASF does not *mandate* that we use its
> facilities for bug tracking. It only wants source control and the
> original distribution point to be on ASF hardware. I'm not necessarily
> advocating that we keep a separate tracker (user confusion), but it is
> possible. Weigh the pros/cons in your mind.

I leave this to others to decide.


> The ASF provides two bug trackers:
>
> 1) Jira at http://issues.apache.org/jira/

+0 .. It is a commercial product, but I heard a lot of good things about it.

> 2) Bugzilla at http://issues.apache​.org/bugzilla/

-0. A long time ago I didn't like bugzilla. And I have something against big
perl projects. Bugzilla survived a long time though.

> For completeness:
>
> 3) Stick to Issuezilla on tigris.org

-0.
I don't think we should keep this on tigris, but it could stay there for a
bit longer if the other option would be to convert twice.

> 4) Use the issue tracker on Google Code in <some> appropriate project.
> [this is my favorite tracker!]

+0. I like the simpilicity, but I don't think using google code for just the
issuetracker is what we want.

> 5) Set up our own tracker on ASF hardware (eg. Trac). [I do not
> recommend this; our project would have to maintain it; ASF Infra only
> maintains Jira/Bugzilla]

I like Traq, but I think we should leave the management to another team, so
this would be a -0 too.

So, no real vote from me on this RFC.

    Bert

« Previous message in topic | 15 of 15 | Next message in topic »

Messages

Show all messages in topic

[RFC] which bug tracker to use? gstein Greg Stein 2009-11-09 07:10:12 PST
     Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? cmpilato C. Michael Pilato 2009-11-09 07:50:27 PST
     Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? arfrever Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2009-11-12 21:34:36 PST
     Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? markphip Mark Phippard 2009-11-09 07:57:15 PST
     Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? jerenkrantz Justin Erenkrantz 2009-11-09 08:06:25 PST
         Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? hwright Hyrum K. Wright 2009-11-09 08:09:26 PST
     Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? Ivan Zhakov <ivan at visualsvn dot com> Ivan Zhakov <ivan at visualsvn dot com> 2009-11-09 08:13:40 PST
         Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? fugazi Larry Shatzer 2009-11-09 08:20:56 PST
         Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? jerenkrantz Justin Erenkrantz 2009-11-09 08:29:23 PST
             Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? dlr Daniel Rall 2009-11-09 09:34:13 PST
     Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? brane Branko Cibej 2009-11-09 09:45:39 PST
     Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? e_wong Edmund Wong 2009-11-09 16:56:04 PST
     Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? gavinbaumanis Gavin Baumanis 2009-11-09 21:08:16 PST
     Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? stylesen Senthil Kumaran S 2009-11-10 00:26:52 PST
     RE: [RFC] which bug tracker to use? rhuijben Bert Huijben 2009-11-10 06:35:46 PST
Messages per page: