Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > dev [DISABLED] > Re: Stop creating mergeinfo on COPY (was: Problems reintegrating the issue-2843-dev branch)

subversion
Discussion topic

Back to topic list

Re: Stop creating mergeinfo on COPY (was: Problems reintegrating the issue-2843-dev branch)

Author Mark Phippard <markphip at gmail dot com>
Full name Mark Phippard <markphip at gmail dot com>
Date 2008-11-12 07:01:30 PST
Message On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:59 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato at collab dot net> wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Paul Burba <ptburba at gmail dot com> wrote:
>>
>>> REALLY FIXING THE PROBLEM:
>>>
>>> Stopping all the WC-to-WC production of needless explicit mergeinfo
>>> would go a longggg way to avoiding this, but that doesn't help those
>>> (including us) with lots of historical subtree mergeinfo. More and
>>> more I think that copy and move (all, not just WC-to-WC) should never
>>> produce mergeinfo on the destination *unless* the source has it. It
>>> can't be worse than what we deal with now...
>>
>> I propose we just do this ... now. Let's just rip this code out of WC
>> to WC copy. Do not create mergeinfo when copying stuff. Forget about
>> making it smarter, let's just stop doing it. The problems we have
>> created by doing this are far worse than the theoretical problems we
>> could prevent by getting it right.
>>
>> Ripping this out will make our product better now and reduce user
>> frustration. If the theoretical problems turn into real problems and
>> if someone is motivated enough to put this code back then they can do
>> so in a way that gets it right.
>>
>> Let's stop the madness. If this one feature had not been put into
>> 1.5, then most of the problems relating to mergeinfo handling we
>> complain about would not even exist.
>
> At the risk of having you show up on my doorstep in a few hours wielding a
> battle axe, I'd suggest:
>
> 1. making 'svn copy WC WC' be mergeinfo-ignorant,
> 2. having that type of invocation print a warning about the fact
> that mergeinfo wasn't honored, and
> 3. add -g as the flag to calculate mergeinfo *with full repository
> access*?

My only objection is that we have said this at least 100 times now. I
am saying lets do #1 .. today. If someone cares enough to do #2 and 3
it will get done.

--
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

« Previous message in topic | 3 of 7 | Next message in topic »

Messages

Show all messages in topic

Stop creating mergeinfo on COPY (was: Problems reintegrating the issue-2843-dev branch) Mark Phippard <markphip at gmail dot com> Mark Phippard <markphip at gmail dot com> 2008-11-12 06:50:14 PST
     Re: Stop creating mergeinfo on COPY (was: Problems reintegrating the issue-2843-dev branch) cmpilato C. Michael Pilato 2008-11-12 06:59:58 PST
         Re: Stop creating mergeinfo on COPY (was: Problems reintegrating the issue-2843-dev branch) Mark Phippard <markphip at gmail dot com> Mark Phippard <markphip at gmail dot com> 2008-11-12 07:01:30 PST
             Re: Stop creating mergeinfo on COPY (was: Problems reintegrating the issue-2843-dev branch) Paul Burba <ptburba at gmail dot com> Paul Burba <ptburba at gmail dot com> 2008-11-12 07:46:32 PST
                 Re: Stop creating mergeinfo on COPY (was: Problems reintegrating the issue-2843-dev branch) Paul Burba <ptburba at gmail dot com> Paul Burba <ptburba at gmail dot com> 2008-11-13 13:11:58 PST
     Re: Stop creating mergeinfo on COPY (was: Problems reintegrating the issue-2843-dev branch) Ivan Zhakov <ivan at visualsvn dot com> Ivan Zhakov <ivan at visualsvn dot com> 2008-11-12 07:06:24 PST
     Re: Stop creating mergeinfo on COPY (was: Problems reintegrating the issue-2843-dev branch) sdanil Danil Shopyrin 2008-11-12 07:03:32 PST
Messages per page: